This is the outline of a study performed by 3 sociologists at the University of Minnesota in 1954, a more detailed description can by found in the book ''When Prophecy Fails'' and this outline is from the book ''The Stargate Conspiracy''.
Before you read this just ask yourself these questions:
*When did you first hear about 21st dec 2012l?
*What do you know personally about this date which you haven't read in books or on the internet?
*How much do you trust the information which has been given concerning 2012?
*When did the 2012 date first appear in the publics conscious, and who did it come from?
*Do you think the mainstream media is trying to influence your 2012 viewpoint sub-consciously?
I first heard of the 2012 date about 2 years ago before which I had no knowledge of any significance attached to this time period or of the mayan calendar. From my understanding the first books started to appear containing 2012 prophecy's in the seventies, and you know how the phenomenon has gradually grown since then.
Anyway these are the details of the 1954 study which I believe is a test run for 2012, you make your own minds up:
'On 27th August 1954 Dorothy Martin received a warning fron the Guardians(ET's) of a wave of imminent catastrophes, which would include the disappearance of the east coast of the United States as well as Britain and France - under the sea on 21st December 1954. The Laugheads (Dr Charles and Lillian Laughead) took the lead in publicising these warnings, taking the story to the press.
At this stage the group of sociologists from the University of Minnesota decided to infiltrate the group in order to make a hands-on study of the behavior of such cults and, in particular, to see first-hand the reactions of true believers when the prophecies failed to materialise. As we know, the east coast of the United States did not find itself in a watery grave on 21st Dec 1954, and neither did Britain or France. The Minnesota study charted the gradual break-up of the group and its members' struggle to come to terms with the failure, and the resulting sense of loss and bereavement that such cruel disillusionment brings in its wake. Only one or two members admitted losing their faith in the Guardians, the majority coming up with a variety of more or less plausible rationalisations - or perhaps 'irrationalisations' - to explain the failure. Some said it had been a test of faith, or that the strength of their belief had actually averted the catastrophe. Quaintly, under the circumstances, the real tension in the group was caused by arguments about which of these excuses was the right one! The circle finally collapsed under the intense weight of public humiliation and ridicule.'
Like it or not 2012 has a cult following and much has been presented as fact with no real basis, alot of the time we are taking the word of a small group of people and now many more have jumped on this runaway train.
If you make enough people believe in a myth and they tell others it moves from myth to fact to public concsiousness.
The real question is why a small group of people are trying to convince us that the world is going to end.
Tags:
Share
Facebook
You need to be a member of 2012Connect to add comments!
Join 2012Connect